Case Media
Case Notes
This page keeps the media, full prompt, and original source together so you can inspect the result first and decide whether the prompt is worth copying, saving, or comparing.
Case Insights
To make this page easier to search, cite, and reuse later, the case is also broken down into practical guidance about usage, visual cues, and prompt structure.
Best Fit Scenarios
- Use this as a character design benchmark when you need a fast style baseline before rewriting your own prompt.
- It is especially helpful if your target overlaps with Illustration, Character, City Visual and you want to judge the image result before tuning wording.
- Keep it as a control sample when you compare nearby prompt variants one variable at a time.
Visual Signals To Notice
- The clearest style signals here are Illustration, Character, City Visual, so those should usually stay in your first rewrite.
- Look at silhouette, costume language, mood styling, and whether the character reads clearly at a glance.
- This case keeps one primary output, so the first image should be treated as the main visual reference.
How The Prompt Is Structured
- The prompt reads as a long, highly specified prompt, which is useful when you want to judge how much specificity this direction needs.
- Its keyword cluster is centered on Illustration, Character, City Visual, so you can usually keep that cluster while swapping subject, camera, layout, or copy details.
- A practical rewrite path is: keep the outcome, keep the strongest style cues, then replace only the subject and environment blocks.
Good Follow-up Questions
- What changes first if you keep Illustration, Character, City Visual but switch the subject matter?
- Which part of the result comes from section-level structure (Character Design) versus tag-level style cues?
- Which related cases in the same section give you a cleaner or more extreme variation of the same direction?
Full Prompt
Goal: Create a clean whiteboard hand-drawn explainer illustration about turning messy tool overload into reusable GPT image skills. Use a playful black marker sketch style with selective red-orange accents and a few yellow highlights. Canvas: Wide 16:9 horizontal canvas, white background, generous margins, centered composition. Hand-drawn black outlines, slightly imperfect marker strokes, minimal shading, no photorealism. Title: At the top center, write the large handwritten headline {argument name="headline text" default="挖场景，造 Skills"}. Use bold black brush lettering, underline it with one red-orange curved stroke, and add two small red-orange emphasis marks on each side of the title. Layout: Arrange the story as a left-to-right workflow with three main illustrated scenes connected by bold black arrows. Scene 1 on the left shows confusion and too many tools; scene 2 in the center shows analyzing the work scenario; scene 3 on the right shows a simplified skill-building pipeline. Scene 1: Draw a confused young person with short black hair scratching their head, a question mark beside them, and a scribbly frustration cloud above. They stand behind a large open box labeled {argument name="tool box label" default="更多工具"}. The box is overflowing with exactly 18 small red-orange cartoon crawfish/lobsters as a metaphor for too many tools: 15 visible inside or on the rim of the box and 3 outside near the bottom/left edges. Each crawfish has simple black eyes, claws, and segmented bodies. Add small motion lines around the box. Scene 2: Draw the same young person leaning over a table with a magnifying glass, studying a paper workflow map. The paper contains a hand-drawn process diagram with exactly 10 small rounded rectangles/nodes, thin black connector arrows, and a few red dashed boxes and red arrows marking important points. Add a small sticky note on the lower left of the paper. In front of the table, place a rectangular label card reading {argument name="scenario label" default="工作场景"}. Scene 3: Draw the same young person smiling and holding or leaning on the first card of a pipeline. The pipeline contains exactly 4 visible cards/icons arranged horizontally: card 1 with a magnifying glass icon and label {argument name="step one label" default="挖场景"}; card 2 with a toolbox/wrench icon and label {argument name="step two label" default="造 Skill"}; card 3 with an upward bar chart and red rising arrow icon labeled {argument name="step three label" default="持续优化"}; card 4 is a small rounded square success card with a red-orange checkmark, surrounded by short yellow radiating lines and sparkle marks. Connect the cards with bold black arrows. Visual style: Simple black-and-white whiteboard illustration, friendly Notion-like doodle proportions, rounded characters, thick marker outlines, sparse red-orange accent color on crawfish, arrows, tools, underlines, and chart arrow. Keep the background empty and uncluttered. Constraints: Preserve the left-to-right narrative and the exact counts of the three main scenes, 18 crawfish/lobsters, 10 workflow nodes, and 4 pipeline cards. Do not add extra panels, logos, watermarks, or dense explanatory text.
