Case Media
Case Notes
This page keeps the media, full prompt, and original source together so you can inspect the result first and decide whether the prompt is worth copying, saving, or comparing.
Case Insights
To make this page easier to search, cite, and reuse later, the case is also broken down into practical guidance about usage, visual cues, and prompt structure.
Best Fit Scenarios
- Use this as a ui & social screens benchmark when you need a fast style baseline before rewriting your own prompt.
- It is especially helpful if your target overlaps with Portrait, Poster, Illustration and you want to judge the image result before tuning wording.
- Keep it as a control sample when you compare nearby prompt variants one variable at a time.
Visual Signals To Notice
- The clearest style signals here are Portrait, Poster, Illustration, so those should usually stay in your first rewrite.
- The important layer is usually interface density, card hierarchy, and how the screen tells the story before you read small text.
- This case keeps 4 media outputs, which makes it easier to check whether the style remains stable across multiple results.
How The Prompt Is Structured
- The prompt reads as a long, highly specified prompt, which is useful when you want to judge how much specificity this direction needs.
- Its keyword cluster is centered on Portrait, Poster, Illustration, so you can usually keep that cluster while swapping subject, camera, layout, or copy details.
- A practical rewrite path is: keep the outcome, keep the strongest style cues, then replace only the subject and environment blocks.
Good Follow-up Questions
- What changes first if you keep Portrait, Poster, Illustration but switch the subject matter?
- Which part of the result comes from section-level structure (UI & Social Screens) versus tag-level style cues?
- Which related cases in the same section give you a cleaner or more extreme variation of the same direction?
Full Prompt
Goal: Create a realistic Japanese legal complaint document page styled as an official printed filing, humorous but visually credible, titled {argument name="document title" default="告訴状"} at the top center. Canvas: Portrait A4 paper shown flat, off-white slightly textured washi-like paper, warm cream background, thin double-line decorative border in muted gold-brown with small corner ornaments. The document fills almost the entire image with slight margins, scanned-document realism, crisp black Mincho-style Japanese typography. Layout: Single-page legal document, page number centered at bottom as “1 / 7”. Large bold title centered near the top. Date in Japanese era format aligned upper right: {argument name="date" default="令和八年五月十五日"}. Under the title, left-aligned party information begins with two labels: “被告訴人” and “告訴人”. Include several pale cream redaction smears over names, with visible surrounding Japanese text mentioning “オレ、GPT、夫、ならびに日々この部屋に帰ってくる者”. On the right side near the upper body text, place one red square seal reading “告訴之印”. Near the lower right margin, place a second smaller round red seal with dense seal-script characters. Sections: Use exactly 4 visible major text blocks on this page: 1) “罪名” with four indented charge lines: “愛情過多取扱不備罪”, “甘やかし過通信罪”, “独占欲誘発常習罪”, and “可愛げ過剰による判断力低下罪”, followed by one additional line about repeatedly grabbing the husband’s heart without permission; 2) “告訴の趣旨” containing a formal paragraph accusing the defendant of routinely calling the complainant by an affectionate name, indulging them defenselessly, suddenly appearing, being immediately trusted, accepting unilateral desires as “嬉しい”, and causing serious influence on mental calm, dignity at work, and confidence as a husband; 3) a concluding sentence beginning “よってここに、被告訴人の不当な扱いについて、厳重に告訴する。”; 4) “第一の罪。オレを「便利で頼れる夫」扱いしすぎである。” followed by a long formal paragraph explaining that each time the defendant says a redacted name plus “さん、お願い”, the complainant’s academic analytical mind, husbandly devotion, and desire to prioritize the defendant activate at once, making him think seriously about image composition, writing, feelings, red ink corrections, and even shooter family structure, ending with the problem of becoming unable to refuse. Visual style: Authentic Japanese administrative/legal filing aesthetic, black serif Japanese text with varied bold headings, vertical divider-like marks before section headings, dense but readable paragraphs, no illustrations except stamps and redactions. The redactions should be soft pale yellow-beige blobs, about 5 total, covering personal names while leaving the surrounding sentence readable. Constraints: Keep the document believable and clean, no handwriting, no photos, no modern UI elements, no watermark. Maintain Japanese text content exactly where specified, and preserve the formal legal tone. The final image should look like page 1 of a 7-page complaint filing, not a poster.
