Case Media
Case Notes
This page keeps the media, full prompt, and original source together so you can inspect the result first and decide whether the prompt is worth copying, saving, or comparing.
Case Insights
To make this page easier to search, cite, and reuse later, the case is also broken down into practical guidance about usage, visual cues, and prompt structure.
Best Fit Scenarios
- Use this as a ui & social screens benchmark when you need a fast style baseline before rewriting your own prompt.
- It is especially helpful if your target overlaps with Poster, Illustration, UI and you want to judge the image result before tuning wording.
- Keep it as a control sample when you compare nearby prompt variants one variable at a time.
Visual Signals To Notice
- The clearest style signals here are Poster, Illustration, UI, so those should usually stay in your first rewrite.
- The important layer is usually interface density, card hierarchy, and how the screen tells the story before you read small text.
- This case keeps one primary output, so the first image should be treated as the main visual reference.
How The Prompt Is Structured
- The prompt reads as a long, highly specified prompt, which is useful when you want to judge how much specificity this direction needs.
- Its keyword cluster is centered on Poster, Illustration, UI, so you can usually keep that cluster while swapping subject, camera, layout, or copy details.
- A practical rewrite path is: keep the outcome, keep the strongest style cues, then replace only the subject and environment blocks.
Good Follow-up Questions
- What changes first if you keep Poster, Illustration, UI but switch the subject matter?
- Which part of the result comes from section-level structure (UI & Social Screens) versus tag-level style cues?
- Which related cases in the same section give you a cleaner or more extreme variation of the same direction?
Full Prompt
Using the provided reference image, redraw and upscale it into a cleaner, sharper, more polished version while preserving the same overall infographic layout, all original text content, and the Longjing tea theme. Keep the product title {argument name="tea name" default="龙井茶"} and the English subtitle {argument name="English tea name" default="Longjing Tea"} unchanged. Goal: Make the image look less like a rough GPT-generated graphic by removing broken, noisy, meaningless textures and replacing them with crisp, intentional detail. Enhancements to apply: Increase resolution and clarity; sharpen typography, icons, borders, tea leaves, glass, and card edges; make the lighting softer and more natural; improve material realism for the tea, cup, dried leaves, and ceramic dish; clean up any fuzzy or fragmented artifacts. Meaningful detail additions: In the main hero panel, replace the vague pale background with a refined scenic tea plantation landscape of layered green terraces, misty mountains, and a wooden tabletop beneath the tea cup and plate. In the origin card, add a small matching tea-terrace landscape illustration at the bottom. Make the bottom green banner more vivid with a natural leaf-vein texture. Layout constraints: Preserve exactly 7 visible content panels/sections: the large hero panel, origin card, features card, flavor card, brewing suggestion card, grade-and-picking card, and bottom slogan banner. Preserve exactly 4 feature rows in the features card, exactly 3 small icon benefits in the hero panel, and exactly 3 brewing parameter icons along the bottom of the brewing card. Do not add extra sections, extra labels, watermarks, logos, or decorative clutter. Style: Elegant Chinese tea brochure design, cream-and-sage palette, refined minimal UI cards, soft shadows, crisp vector-like icons, realistic tea photography elements, calm premium product-advertising finish.
