案例媒体

案例说明
这个页面把案例媒体、完整 Prompt 和出处放在一起,方便你先看结果,再判断这条 Prompt 是否值得复制、收藏或加入对比。
案例解读
为了方便搜索、引用和后续复用,这里会把案例的适用场景、画面重点和 Prompt 结构拆成更容易浏览的说明。
这类案例适合用在什么场景
- 把它当作 人像与摄影 的基准案例最合适,先看成片方向,再决定自己的 Prompt 要往哪边改。
- 如果你的目标也落在 人像、海报、排版 这些方向,这条案例特别适合先看图判断风格,再回头微调描述。
- 做 Prompt 对比时,也很适合作为控制组,只改一个变量去看结果变化。
画面重点与风格信号
- 这条案例最明显的风格信号集中在 人像、海报、排版,所以第一次改写时最好先保留这些关键词。
- 重点先看构图、光线方向、人物姿态,以及主体和镜头之间的距离感。
- 当前只有一张主图,所以第一张结果图就是最核心的参考基准。
Prompt 结构可以怎么理解
- 这条 Prompt 整体属于一条比较长、约束条件很多的 Prompt,很适合拿来判断这类方向到底需要写到多细。
- 关键词簇主要围绕 人像、海报、排版 展开,所以复用时可以先保留这组风格词,再替换主体、镜头、环境或文案信息。
- 最稳的改写方式通常是先保留结果方向和最强风格信号,只替换主体设定与场景块。
如果你是带着问题来的,可以先看这些角度
- 如果保留 人像、海报、排版,只换主体题材,结果最先变化的会是哪一部分?
- 这条结果里,哪些特征更像是 人像与摄影 的结构特征,哪些又是标签风格本身带来的?
- 同分类的相关案例里,哪几条能给你更克制或更极致的相邻变体?
完整 Prompt
16:9 -> class theoretical_physics_infographic_dna: def __init__(self): self.subject = "[ai selects: 4 distinct advanced physics theorems or paradoxes (e.g., bell's theorem, hawking radiation, string theory)]" self.parents = { "composition_parent": "large hadron collider blueprints — hyper-complex radial symmetry, intersecting particle beam rings, millimeter-precise drafting", "atmosphere_parent": "deep space observatory photography — pitch black voids, glowing ultraviolet radiation, high-contrast laser illumination", "graphic_parent": "chalkboard maximalism — elegant, dense mathematical notation floating as glowing white vectors", "detail_parent": "victorian brass optical instruments — finely milled prisms, glass lenses, and mirrored refraction planes" } self.mutations = { "medium_mutation": "the mathematical formulas solidify into glowing, three-dimensional glass sculptures bending the light around them", "information_mutation": "particle collision tracks are woven like fine gold thread through the dark background", "semantic_mutation": "the invisible physical law is rendered as a massive, tangible, gravitational machine distorting the grid of the poster itself" } def generate_grid(self): instruction = """ generate a 2x2 grid of vertical luxury infographic posters giving physical form to the chosen [subject]s. invent a magnificent scientific machine or optical diorama for each. explode the layers to show quantum states, gravitational warping, equations, and subatomic scale. the design must feel like a classified schematic from a hyper-advanced, aesthetically obsessed civilization. semantic inference must make the invisible laws of physics breathtakingly visible. """ return render( instruction, format="2x2 grid, vertical luxury posters, conceptual scientific infographic", typography=""" large title: [name of theorem/paradox] subtitle: [the physicist / the era] microtext: [the core equation / metric tensor / explanatory blazon] """, composition="strict radial or gravitational-well symmetry. razor-sharp fine lines contrasting with deep voids.", lighting="harsh, clinical laser light interacting with pure optical glass and vantablack.", constraints="no cartoon atoms, no clip-art planets, no messy chalkboards. only pristine, museum-grade scientific aesthetic." )



