案例媒体

案例说明
这个页面把案例媒体、完整 Prompt 和出处放在一起,方便你先看结果,再判断这条 Prompt 是否值得复制、收藏或加入对比。
案例解读
为了方便搜索、引用和后续复用,这里会把案例的适用场景、画面重点和 Prompt 结构拆成更容易浏览的说明。
这类案例适合用在什么场景
- 把它当作 角色设计 的基准案例最合适,先看成片方向,再决定自己的 Prompt 要往哪边改。
- 如果你的目标也落在 插画、角色、城市视觉 这些方向,这条案例特别适合先看图判断风格,再回头微调描述。
- 做 Prompt 对比时,也很适合作为控制组,只改一个变量去看结果变化。
画面重点与风格信号
- 这条案例最明显的风格信号集中在 插画、角色、城市视觉,所以第一次改写时最好先保留这些关键词。
- 重点可以先看轮廓、服饰语言、情绪气质,以及角色是否一眼就能立住。
- 当前只有一张主图,所以第一张结果图就是最核心的参考基准。
Prompt 结构可以怎么理解
- 这条 Prompt 整体属于一条比较长、约束条件很多的 Prompt,很适合拿来判断这类方向到底需要写到多细。
- 关键词簇主要围绕 插画、角色、城市视觉 展开,所以复用时可以先保留这组风格词,再替换主体、镜头、环境或文案信息。
- 最稳的改写方式通常是先保留结果方向和最强风格信号,只替换主体设定与场景块。
如果你是带着问题来的,可以先看这些角度
- 如果保留 插画、角色、城市视觉,只换主体题材,结果最先变化的会是哪一部分?
- 这条结果里,哪些特征更像是 角色设计 的结构特征,哪些又是标签风格本身带来的?
- 同分类的相关案例里,哪几条能给你更克制或更极致的相邻变体?
完整 Prompt
Goal: Create a clean whiteboard hand-drawn explainer illustration about turning messy tool overload into reusable GPT image skills. Use a playful black marker sketch style with selective red-orange accents and a few yellow highlights. Canvas: Wide 16:9 horizontal canvas, white background, generous margins, centered composition. Hand-drawn black outlines, slightly imperfect marker strokes, minimal shading, no photorealism. Title: At the top center, write the large handwritten headline {argument name="headline text" default="挖场景,造 Skills"}. Use bold black brush lettering, underline it with one red-orange curved stroke, and add two small red-orange emphasis marks on each side of the title. Layout: Arrange the story as a left-to-right workflow with three main illustrated scenes connected by bold black arrows. Scene 1 on the left shows confusion and too many tools; scene 2 in the center shows analyzing the work scenario; scene 3 on the right shows a simplified skill-building pipeline. Scene 1: Draw a confused young person with short black hair scratching their head, a question mark beside them, and a scribbly frustration cloud above. They stand behind a large open box labeled {argument name="tool box label" default="更多工具"}. The box is overflowing with exactly 18 small red-orange cartoon crawfish/lobsters as a metaphor for too many tools: 15 visible inside or on the rim of the box and 3 outside near the bottom/left edges. Each crawfish has simple black eyes, claws, and segmented bodies. Add small motion lines around the box. Scene 2: Draw the same young person leaning over a table with a magnifying glass, studying a paper workflow map. The paper contains a hand-drawn process diagram with exactly 10 small rounded rectangles/nodes, thin black connector arrows, and a few red dashed boxes and red arrows marking important points. Add a small sticky note on the lower left of the paper. In front of the table, place a rectangular label card reading {argument name="scenario label" default="工作场景"}. Scene 3: Draw the same young person smiling and holding or leaning on the first card of a pipeline. The pipeline contains exactly 4 visible cards/icons arranged horizontally: card 1 with a magnifying glass icon and label {argument name="step one label" default="挖场景"}; card 2 with a toolbox/wrench icon and label {argument name="step two label" default="造 Skill"}; card 3 with an upward bar chart and red rising arrow icon labeled {argument name="step three label" default="持续优化"}; card 4 is a small rounded square success card with a red-orange checkmark, surrounded by short yellow radiating lines and sparkle marks. Connect the cards with bold black arrows. Visual style: Simple black-and-white whiteboard illustration, friendly Notion-like doodle proportions, rounded characters, thick marker outlines, sparse red-orange accent color on crawfish, arrows, tools, underlines, and chart arrow. Keep the background empty and uncluttered. Constraints: Preserve the left-to-right narrative and the exact counts of the three main scenes, 18 crawfish/lobsters, 10 workflow nodes, and 4 pipeline cards. Do not add extra panels, logos, watermarks, or dense explanatory text.



