Case Media

Case Notes
This page keeps the media, full prompt, and original source together so you can inspect the result first and decide whether the prompt is worth copying, saving, or comparing.
Case Insights
To make this page easier to search, cite, and reuse later, the case is also broken down into practical guidance about usage, visual cues, and prompt structure.
Best Fit Scenarios
- Use this as a portrait & photography benchmark when you need a fast style baseline before rewriting your own prompt.
- It is especially helpful if your target overlaps with Portrait, Fashion, Vertical and you want to judge the image result before tuning wording.
- Keep it as a control sample when you compare nearby prompt variants one variable at a time.
Visual Signals To Notice
- The clearest style signals here are Portrait, Fashion, Vertical, so those should usually stay in your first rewrite.
- Focus on framing, light direction, pose, and the distance between subject and camera.
- This case keeps one primary output, so the first image should be treated as the main visual reference.
How The Prompt Is Structured
- The prompt reads as a long, highly specified prompt, which is useful when you want to judge how much specificity this direction needs.
- Its keyword cluster is centered on Portrait, Fashion, Vertical, so you can usually keep that cluster while swapping subject, camera, layout, or copy details.
- A practical rewrite path is: keep the outcome, keep the strongest style cues, then replace only the subject and environment blocks.
Good Follow-up Questions
- What changes first if you keep Portrait, Fashion, Vertical but switch the subject matter?
- Which part of the result comes from section-level structure (Portrait & Photography) versus tag-level style cues?
- Which related cases in the same section give you a cleaner or more extreme variation of the same direction?
Full Prompt
Use uploaded image as main subject foundation. STRICTLY preserve the subject’s original facial features, identity, body proportions, hairstyle, and recognizable traits. Ignore unrelated original background elements. Chaotic Y2K CCD digicam aesthetic. The subject (they/them) is screaming excitedly while aggressively chasing a cat . The cat is biting and carrying a fresh silver fish. Randomized authentic Y2K street-fashion outfit styling, layered early-2000s Tokyo/Shibuya fashion, trendy chaotic youth aesthetic, paparazzi snapshot energy. DUAL focal point composition: * the cat’s face is the PRIMARY focal point * the subject’s face is the SECONDARY focal point The cat’s face is EXTREMELY close to the viewer and dominates the foreground frame, positioned near the bottom-right area, partially cropped by the lens. Huge fisheye distortion on the cat’s face, exaggerated proximity, detailed fur, wide chaotic eyes, fish swinging violently from its mouth. The subject is positioned slightly farther behind but still extremely close to camera, running aggressively toward the cat. Their eyes and face are specifically directed toward the cat, creating strong visual interaction and pursuit energy. Extreme low-angle ultra-wide fisheye shot, dramatic Dutch/canted angle, invasive “in-your-face” framing, asymmetrical composition, warped perspective, aggressive foreshortening distortion. VERY intense chaotic motion blur: * strong radial blur * violent directional streaks * shutter drag effect * CCD smear artifacts * distorted speed trails * chaotic camera shake energy Scattering pigeons exploding across the frame, urban debris streaking through scene, accidental chaotic comedic moment. Harsh direct front flash exposure, strong CCD bloom, overexposed sunlight in frame corner, chromatic aberration, dirty analog digicam texture, paparazzi snapshot aesthetic, blown highlights, gritty early-2000s digital camera feel. Bright sunny urban street background heavily warped and motion-smeared from speed and fisheye lens distortion. aspect ratio : 9:16



