Case Media
Case Notes
This page keeps the media, full prompt, and original source together so you can inspect the result first and decide whether the prompt is worth copying, saving, or comparing.
Case Insights
To make this page easier to search, cite, and reuse later, the case is also broken down into practical guidance about usage, visual cues, and prompt structure.
Best Fit Scenarios
- Use this as a character design benchmark when you need a fast style baseline before rewriting your own prompt.
- It is especially helpful if your target overlaps with Portrait, Cinematic, Fashion and you want to judge the image result before tuning wording.
- Keep it as a control sample when you compare nearby prompt variants one variable at a time.
Visual Signals To Notice
- The clearest style signals here are Portrait, Cinematic, Fashion, so those should usually stay in your first rewrite.
- Look at silhouette, costume language, mood styling, and whether the character reads clearly at a glance.
- This case keeps one primary output, so the first image should be treated as the main visual reference.
How The Prompt Is Structured
- The prompt reads as a long, highly specified prompt, which is useful when you want to judge how much specificity this direction needs.
- Its keyword cluster is centered on Portrait, Cinematic, Fashion, so you can usually keep that cluster while swapping subject, camera, layout, or copy details.
- A practical rewrite path is: keep the outcome, keep the strongest style cues, then replace only the subject and environment blocks.
Good Follow-up Questions
- What changes first if you keep Portrait, Cinematic, Fashion but switch the subject matter?
- Which part of the result comes from section-level structure (Character Design) versus tag-level style cues?
- Which related cases in the same section give you a cleaner or more extreme variation of the same direction?
Full Prompt
Use the uploaded portrait only as the identity and hairstyle reference. Preserve the real facial identity, face shape, facial features, skin tone, hairstyle, hair volume, and natural real-life appearance. Do not copy the original portrait’s clothes, background, lighting, pose, or image quality. Create a hyper-realistic surreal fashion advertising photo in a modern architectural plaza. The same person appears in three different scales within one scene. In the foreground, show a normal-size version of the person close to the camera, intentionally out of focus with strong depth of field blur. She wears a clean white short-sleeve shirt and a dark striped tie, with a soft calm expression, slightly posing with one hand near the chin. In the background, a giant enlarged version of the same person is hidden behind a large modern white stone museum building, only the upper face, head, hand, and pointing finger visible. The giant version looks toward the camera and points at a huge billboard on the building wall. On the building facade, place a large clean vertical fashion billboard showing the same person clearly, wearing a white shirt and dark tie, posing elegantly like a school-uniform fashion portrait. The billboard should look like a real outdoor advertisement printed on the building, with realistic perspective, shadows, and material texture. Scene details: bright daytime, pale blue sky, clean modern plaza, white geometric architecture, glass windows, realistic sunlight, soft shadows, slightly cool color grading, cinematic commercial photography, surreal scale illusion, realistic skin texture, natural hair strands, high-end editorial fashion look, sharp architectural details, real camera depth of field, ultra-realistic, no watermark, no logo, no Chinese text, no random text Negative Prompt： watermark, logo, Chinese text, random text, AI-generated mark, Doubao watermark, blurry main face, distorted face, changed identity, different person, fake skin, plastic skin, over-smoothed skin, anime, cartoon, illustration, doll-like face, bad anatomy, deformed hands, extra fingers, missing fingers, broken fingers, unnatural arms, wrong perspective, floating body parts, duplicated messy face, low-resolution, overexposed, dirty background, messy billboard, unreadable text, poster artifacts, unrealistic architecture, warped building, bad composition
